In Plain Sight

Upon reading various comments from fellow readers, a significant realization hit me: we can’t critique a novel from the 1950s using the same lens we apply to contemporary works. The consensus was that the emphasis back then was primarily on plot rather than character development. Consequently, readers expecting to forge a bond with the protagonists might find themselves disillusioned. It became startlingly clear after someone noted that the characters felt superficial and predictable, akin to chess pieces moving at the story's beck and call.

Psychological Depth

I concur that earlier sci-fi often features characters that lack depth, serving mainly to progress the narrative. This might explain the lingering perception of sci-fi as a lesser form of literature among some critics. Despite this, I have enjoyed many classic pieces from as far back as the 1930s, especially when they were shorter works often included in anthologies. Yet, once a story exceeds around 70,000 words, modern readers expect a deeper emotional connection with the main characters.

For centuries, the psychological complexity of characters has been a hallmark of what we define as literature. I don't believe that flat characters can be justified simply because a book was written decades ago. Engaging characters are essential for grounding any narrative, particularly in fantastical settings that require us to stretch our imaginations. We naturally seek connections with the characters, as it is part of our human experience.

We Listen When We Care

Reflecting on our daily exchanges, it’s evident that the stories we share would lose their appeal without the emotional investment we have in the characters. I often recount my supermarket escapades to my partner, elaborating in a way that seems excessive. Yet, she listens intently because she cares about me. In turn, I am engaged when she discusses her work challenges, even if they seem mundane. Our friends and family may not lead the most extraordinary lives, but their narratives are the ones we cherish.

Was Anyone Wrong?

So, does this mean that everyone who has hailed this literary work as a classic was mistaken? Should it be relegated to the realm of mediocre literature simply because I and some contemporaries struggle to engage with it? I believe not. The characters were likely compelling enough for the audience of their time, and they may still resonate with many readers today.

Ultimately, the stories we tell ourselves hold value only in relation to the people we share them with.

Today's level of cautious optimism: 60%.

Written while listening to: ‘Liberamente’ by Dawn Chorus and the Infallible Sea

Thank you for joining me on this journey! Your support is incredibly valuable as I embark on this new chapter on Medium. Likes and follows are greatly appreciated.

Who am I, you may wonder?

I am a musician who writes and a writer who makes music. You can explore my world here.

The Importance of Point of View

Choosing the right perspective can significantly alter how a story is perceived.

In "How to Choose Your Story's Point of View," we explore various narrative perspectives and their impact on storytelling, enhancing our understanding of character connection.