The Critical Role of Consistency Checking in Our Beliefs
Written on
Chapter 1: The Evolutionary Gap in Our Thinking
In today's digital age, the internet has made it all too easy for individuals to adopt beliefs that defy logic and reason. Many people are convinced that events like the Apollo moon landings were staged, that the Earth is flat, or that secretive groups manipulate global affairs from the shadows. This phenomenon is not confined to fringe theories; countless individuals subscribe to various fantastical notions, including the existence of unseen deities or supernatural occurrences.
Why are so many susceptible to these absurd ideas? Why do we consistently fall prey to the persuasive rhetoric of charismatic leaders, a pattern evident throughout history?
At its core, the answer lies in our brain's evolutionary development. Our minds were shaped in environments vastly different from the modern world. Early humans on the African savannah and in ancient forests developed to minimize cognitive effort. Thinking requires energy, and in a survival context, expending calories on complex thought could jeopardize survival. If our ancestors had been too exhausted from deliberation to evade predators or forage for food, humanity might not exist today.
Consequently, cognitive effort tends to be a last resort. Even with today's abundant food supplies, we seldom engage in deep thinking, often simply regurgitating ideas and memes we've encountered.
Worse, our evolutionary past did not equip us with the ability to evaluate whether our beliefs are logically consistent. Thus, we can hold contradictory views without recognizing the inherent contradictions.
While our brains struggle with consistency, the universe is governed by unchanging principles. Fundamental forces remain constant, and nature operates in predictable ways, even on the smallest scales. Although scientific theories may seem incompatible, they are not mutually exclusive; each offers valuable insights depending on the context.
This is where consistency checking comes into play. It serves as a mechanism to navigate our cognitive limitations and is foundational to scientific advancement. When inconsistencies arise in our theories, it signals that something is amiss, prompting us to search for answers. Historical breakthroughs, such as Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and Darwin's Theory of Evolution, emerged from recognizing and resolving inconsistencies.
However, in daily life, we rarely employ this critical tool. Just as we must learn calculus, consistency checking requires cultivation and practice, which is often neglected. As a result, simplistic ideas can spread rapidly, appealing to our preference for easy-to-understand concepts.
Consistency checking is essential for distinguishing fact from fiction.
Section 1.1: Analyzing Conspiracy Theories
Consider two prevalent conspiracy theories: the claim that the moon landings were faked and the assertion that contrails are part of a secret government plot to poison the atmosphere.
The Apollo program unfolded during a fierce competition between the USA and the Soviet Union, with national pride and global standing on the line. Radio communications during the missions were not encrypted, allowing both countries to monitor each other's activities. The question arises: if the moon landings were fabricated, would the Soviets remain silent? Furthermore, could hundreds of thousands of people involved in the missions maintain this conspiracy for over fifty years without a single leak?
Now, let’s apply the same scrutiny to the contrails theory, which posits a vast conspiracy involving countless individuals. The notion that thousands would willingly collaborate to harm their own families is implausible. Why has no scientist ever revealed the chemical signatures of this supposed covert operation?
The failure of conspiracy theorists to engage in basic consistency checking highlights a broader issue. Studies show that when confronted with evidence disproving their beliefs, individuals often double down on their misconceptions.
Section 1.2: The Challenge of Changing Beliefs
Engaging in rational discourse with those who cling to fantastical beliefs is often futile. Changing one’s viewpoint demands significant cognitive resources, resulting in emotional resistance. It is easier to deny reality than to confront uncomfortable truths.
Consider the Flat Earth theory. One simple observation, such as the spherical shape of soap bubbles, provides compelling evidence for a round Earth. This is just one of countless pieces of evidence, yet the simplicity of the Flat Earth idea appeals to our cognitive predisposition toward straightforward concepts.
The educational system often fails to equip individuals with the tools to critically assess information. Many conspiracy theorists demonstrate a lack of foundational knowledge, rendering them susceptible to simplistic explanations.
Chapter 2: Strategies for Improvement
What can we do to counteract these cognitive limitations and the harm caused by unfounded beliefs? First, we must become aware of our own cognitive weaknesses and seek information from credible sources rather than accepting everything we read at face value.
Engaging in consistency checking—evaluating whether new information aligns with established knowledge—can significantly enhance our understanding.
Our education systems should prioritize teaching students how to gather accurate information and draw logical conclusions, moving beyond rote memorization.
Moreover, society must not tolerate the deliberate deception of its members. We must recognize that the freedom of speech does not grant permission to mislead the vulnerable. Establishing independent bodies to uphold truth and protect citizens from misinformation could serve as a safeguard against manipulation.
While concerns about censorship and information monopolies are valid, the consequences of inaction are far more severe.
In the first video, Simon Sinek emphasizes the importance of consistency in achieving success. He discusses how maintaining a consistent approach can lead to greater effectiveness and fulfillment in various aspects of life.
The second video highlights the critical role consistency plays over mere persistence. It argues that consistency builds trust and reliability, essential components for progress in personal and professional realms.