# Examining the Impact of Transition on Trans Individuals
Written on
Understanding Transition
Is transitioning truly beneficial for individuals? This question has been raised time and again.
I’ve encountered the argument countless times: "Gender is simply biological; you’re either XX or XY. You’re born male or female, and that’s unchangeable. Facts don’t care about your feelings." As someone who identifies as transgender, I’ve grappled with this perspective for a significant period. Today, I will delve into the data myself.
Often, those unfamiliar with biological science view it as a rigid field. However, the reality is that science is filled with complexities. Nothing is ever definitively "proven"; rather, it presents a continuum from "disproven" to "strongly suggested." While we can assert that a particular claim doesn’t align with the data, scientific findings come with nuances. Reputable research never claims absolute certainty; rather, it can only suggest probabilities, always leaving room for doubt.
In recent years, the conversation surrounding what defines a transgender individual has intensified. With the growing acceptance of transgender identities, dissenting opinions have also surfaced. Some people mistakenly consider being transgender as a mental disorder, perpetuating harmful misconceptions that impact not only individuals but society at large.
Frequently, we hear the assertion that transitioning does not provide benefits. Critics argue that individuals do not experience increased happiness following Gender Reassignment Therapies (GRT) or Surgery (GRS). Some even claim that transgender individuals regret their decisions, leading to de-transitioning, depression, and, tragically, suicide.
So, the pressing question remains: Does transitioning genuinely assist transgender individuals?
The Positive Aspects
A study conducted by Weinforth et al., titled "Quality Of Life Following Male-To-Female Sex Reassignment Surgery," presents compelling evidence leaning toward a positive conclusion.
This research reviewed data gathered from studies employing the "SF-36" and "WHOQOL-100," both of which are trusted questionnaires for evaluating health-related quality of life following treatment. These tools assess the impact of treatments on mental health, physical health, and overall quality of life.
In various studies utilizing the SF-36, results indicated that after GRS, individuals experienced improvements in areas such as "social functioning," "emotional role functioning," "general health perceptions," "vitality," and "mental health." Furthermore, comparisons revealed that trans women who underwent GRS reported significantly better mental health than their cisgender counterparts.
While some individuals did report heightened physical discomfort and decreased physical function after surgery, it was noted that after five years, their pain levels returned to those comparable to the general population. Additionally, studies employing the WHOQOL-100 showed increased sexual activity and enhanced social relationships among post-operative trans individuals. Other research indicated that these individuals reported high levels of "subjective happiness," "life satisfaction," and "overall well-being."
The Challenges
Despite the abundance of positive findings, I believe it’s essential to acknowledge the complexities of this narrative. Some studies have identified declines in areas such as physical health, independence, energy, fatigue, sleep, mobility, and daily activities. Notably, one study focused primarily on male-to-female trans individuals in Brazil, a country known for its xenophobia toward transgender people, which likely contributed to their struggles.
Moreover, a reported downside of transitioning is an increased incidence of urinary incontinence. This may sound alarming, but it’s crucial to understand that GRS involves surgical alterations to the urethra, which can temporarily affect the muscles responsible for urinary control.
The Scientific Perspective
The evidence suggests that transitioning positively influences aspects such as mental health, sexuality, life satisfaction, and overall quality of life. However, can we definitively prove that gender dysphoria is a legitimate condition? As Mr. Shapiro asserts, "Facts don’t care about your feelings."
Sexual dimorphism refers to the biological differences between males and females, which can be prominently observed in various species, such as the peafowl. The male peacock is renowned for its vibrant plumage, while the female peahen exhibits a more subdued appearance. These differences extend beyond mere aesthetics and are evident in brain structure, often influenced by sex hormones—estrogen and testosterone.
Over the past two decades, researchers have explored these differences in rodent models. In a study by Schwarz et al., the introduction of sex hormones during a crucial developmental period led to observable changes in behavior. This suggests that hormonal influences during pregnancy can shape gender expression even before birth.
Further research by Theisen et al. sought to unravel the biological basis of gender dysphoria. They found that during pregnancy, male fetuses experience a surge of testosterone, which later converts to estrogen, promoting pathways associated with male characteristics. Conversely, female fetuses do not undergo this hormonal shift, resulting in the absence of male-associated pathways.
In rodent trials, manipulating hormone exposure during critical developmental phases led to both cross-sex behaviors and neurodevelopmental changes. These findings indicate that the presence or absence of testosterone during pregnancy can permanently alter sex-specific brain pathways.
Additionally, Theisen et al. identified rare gene variants associated with physiological differences by sequencing the DNA of transgender individuals. This suggests that prenatal hormonal influences may play a significant role in shaping transgender identities, indicating that being transgender may be an inherent trait.
Conclusion
While I acknowledge the complexities of scientific inquiry, the data presented here offers substantial insights. It appears that being transgender is likely influenced by hormonal factors during critical developmental periods in utero. Furthermore, transitioning seems to provide significant benefits to individuals undergoing this process.
Facts, after all, remain indifferent to individual feelings.
The first video titled "Roadmap for Transitioning to Data Analytics in 2023" explores the steps and considerations for individuals looking to transition into data analytics roles.
The second video, "How to Transition to Data Roles | Data Analysis | Data Science," provides valuable insights and practical advice for those navigating their way into data-focused careers.