Exploring Evolutionary Trees: Insights from Cdc25 Protein
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Evolutionary Trees
Recently, I stumbled upon a fascinating article in my Google News feed regarding evolutionary trees, speciation rates, and extinction events. I can’t help but wonder if this was a coincidence, given my penchant for science-related content. For the record, I’ve been experimenting with my own evolutionary trees recently, which you can see illustrated here.
Evolutionary trees hold great significance in biology, and I would love to share insights about them, along with the remarkable discoveries they can unveil. Charles Darwin was one of the pioneers who conceptualized evolutionary trees, famously sketching an early representation in his notebooks. One of the most striking elements of this sketch is the phrase he wrote in the corner: "I think."
What is an evolutionary tree, you may ask? Essentially, it’s a visual representation that ranks the similarities and differences among species, built on the foundation of Darwin’s evolutionary theory. For instance, if an ancestral species evolves into two distinct species, they will initially share many characteristics—like a red squirrel and a gray one. Graphically, we depict this as two adjacent twigs, where both new species represent the tips and the ancestral squirrel is the branching point. Over time, as these species evolve further, their differences may expand significantly.
For a more comprehensive explanation, the Khan Academy provides an excellent overview of evolutionary trees.
Chapter 2: My Research on the Cdc25 Protein
In my research, I focused on a specific protein known as Cdc25—not on the protein itself, but rather on the regulation of its gene. Out of sheer curiosity, influenced by the social distancing norms, I wanted to explore the evolutionary relationships of this protein across various organisms.
Now, I should clarify that in the biological community, there are strict conventions for naming genes and proteins, including capitalization and italicization. For simplicity, I’ll refer to the protein and gene as Cdc25 across all species.
To construct my evolutionary tree, I gathered the amino acid sequences of Cdc25 proteins from multiple organisms, available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. I then utilized an online tool called Clustal Omega, which compares these amino acid sequences to determine their similarities and differences, ultimately creating a phylogenetic tree.
If you’re interested in the technical details, there are numerous papers that delve into the methodology behind Clustal Omega.
Building a phylogenetic tree for any protein is straightforward with the right tools, but my focus here is Cdc25. Let’s delve into why the Cdc25 gene is particularly significant.
Section 2.1: The Significance of the Cdc25 Gene
The Cdc25 gene was first identified for its role in regulating cell division in fission yeast, a discovery made by Paul Russell and Paul Nurse in 1986, which later led to Nurse receiving a Nobel Prize in 2001. For a more engaging take on this topic, I recommend listening to Paul Nurse’s entertaining story told during a Moth Story Hour.
It's crucial to identify the genes that regulate cell division, as this process is fundamental for cellular reproduction and understanding diseases like cancer. However, the initial discovery in yeast often raises eyebrows, leading to a collective "who cares" from many scientists. The real breakthrough came when it was shown that humans possess a version of Cdc25 that can replace the defective yeast version, indicating its conservation across species.
Section 2.2: Analyzing the Cdc25 Evolutionary Tree
Now, let’s delve into the details of my Cdc25 evolutionary tree. Humans have three distinct Cdc25 genes, labeled Cdc25A, Cdc25B, and Cdc25C. Interestingly, yeast possesses only one Cdc25 gene. I was eager to see how these genes relate across various species, from single-celled yeast to humans.
To my surprise, the Cdc25 tree revealed unexpected relationships. While I anticipated that the human Cdc25 genes would cluster closely together, this was not the case. In fact, one human Cdc25 gene was more closely related to a mouse gene than to other human Cdc25 genes.
As you can see from the tree, Cdc25C from humans is more closely aligned with frog genes than with Cdc25A or B, and Cdc25A shows closer ties to a lizard gene than to its human counterparts. This unexpected relationship raises intriguing questions about evolutionary processes.
Section 2.3: Implications and Broader Perspectives
From a broader perspective, the relationships depicted in my Cdc25 tree highlight well-known concepts in biology. Humans share fundamental developmental patterns with a range of species, including lizards and worms, all linked by the presence of Hox genes.
These Hox genes, crucial for segmental development, exhibit a high degree of evolutionary conservation, akin to Cdc25. Interestingly, humans possess multiple clusters of Hox genes, and their duplication over time has led to significant evolutionary advancements.
The Cdc25 tree suggests that a duplication event occurred between fish and frogs, leading to the divergence of Cdc25 functions as these genes evolved. This evolutionary history is reflected in the similarities among protein sequences, offering a glimpse into our biological heritage.
Thank you for joining me in this exploration of evolutionary trees and the Cdc25 protein. For more intriguing stories related to evolution, consider reading about our African origins and the concept of Mitochondrial Eve, or our quest to find the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of all life.
Thank you for your interest, and please feel free to share!